Thursday, 8 March 2012

Maybe a proof reader would not solve all the Daily Mail's problems

I was looking at an article in the Daily Mail about Sarah Blakely, of whom I have never heard, and her product Spanx, of which I've never heard either. Apparently this miracle item of ladies apparel has made her a billionaire and earned her a place in Forbes Magazine - see right.
Apparently Ms Blakely's eureka moment came when she was selling fax machines door to door
and..............

I have more questions about this than I can shake a stick at.
1) A pair of pantyhose is singular so wishing for "pantyhose that didn't have seamed toes" inplies that she has invented pantyhose that don't have seamed toes now. Because didn't implies at the time.
2) Similarly "didn't roll up the leg" I don't understand what this means even when I correct the syntax - maybe I will have to try wearing a pair of lady's tights on a hot day to find out.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but was her problem simply that her feet were getting hot in her pantyhose and so she used to cut the toes off as a cooling measure? But the result was that the leg part of the hose would then slide upwards away from the toes altogether. Well it would, wouldn't it? Much as if I cut the toes off my socks, I would expect the hosery item to become ankle warmers within minutes of walking anywhere in them. Anyway back to Ms Blakely. Surely all of this suggests that she has invented cooler tights? But no. Spanx seems to be a type of slimming corset but the article fails totally to make this clear.
Here is the link to the article. I've got a headache now

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be moderated