Sunday, 17 June 2012

I wish they would stop referring to flesh colour as "nude"



Why does the press call this colour "nude"? It's got nothing to do with nude and gets perverts like me all excited for nothing. I don't see what was wrong with calling it "flesh" or even "flesh-coloured"

On the right is what the Mail Online describes as a "plunging nude pantsuit" on somebody called Mollie King. No, I've never heard of her either! But so far as I can see it's neither plunging nor nude and I'm not even sure that it can really be called a pantsuit. Surely suits have jackets and not just some kind of wrap round shirt?

What gets my goat is when the press refers to flesh coloured shoes as "nude heels" What a bloody stupid term! A person's heels are naturally nude having been born that way. You can cover them with hosiery or shoes but they are still nude underneath and nude skin on a human is flesh coloured.
That's FLESH coloured you morons!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be moderated