Having read this item several times (no I've nothing better to do at present) I can find no definite indication as to the exact wording of the settlement or judgement reached in the legal action.
Reading between the lines I gather that Tulisa was concerned by rumours that she may have released the sex(?) tape herself for, presumably, reasons of publicity. I can recall no such rumours at the time and indeed she went to the trouble of making a you tube video condemning the film maker and orchestrator of her troubles, a certain Justin Edwards by name. I find it a bit strange therefore that she should take legal action just to prove something that most people already accepted especially as there has been no mention of damages, of undisclosed amount or otherwise.
In a rather bizarrely worded statement read outside the High Court Tulisa said:
I'm especially grateful for all the support I have received from the public, my friends, family and team.The use of the word "especially" would usually suggest that there were other people to whom she was also grateful though in a lesser way. I wonder who else could there possibly be as she's already mentioned everybody who knows her or of her?
It's also rather odd that she has chosen this day to unveil her new hair. I can understand her desire to make a fresh start with a fresh appearance BUT she had her hair like this when she made the sex tape. Could it be that Ms Contostavlos is better at the publicity business than we have given her credit for and that she has dealt the press a very neat double bluff?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be moderated