Monday, 6 August 2012

Perfect pins? I don't think so DM. They are just very ordinary legs

I don't really understand why the Daily Mail, when it uses papparazi pics of a female celebrity in a mini skirt or shorts, has always to describe her as having 'perfect pins.' Apart from the fact that I hate the word 'pins' - what is wrong with using 'legs'? (ok it's not alliterative with 'perfect' but so what, there are no prizes for this kind of junk journalism).
So often the legs in question are far from perfect.
Maybe the Daily Mail feels that if it didn't mention the legs there would be no article at all. Well ok, I could live with that.
But there are alternatives. Here for the use of DM journos is my brief guide to leg adjectives:
Long legs - mundane but often very appropriate.
Langourous legs - evocative and sexy.
Elegant legs - best applied judiciously (i.e. not to the kind of legs which appear in DM).
Shapely legs - not very imaginative but then again neither is 'perfect pins'
Glossy legs - my own favourite but best used to describe legs belonginging to a girl NO older than 19.

Personally I would use none of the above to describe the legs pictured here.
I am certainly not a believer in the old dictum: if one has nothing nice to say then it is better to say nothing at all. But in this instance it definitely would be appropriate.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be moderated