I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories (as I've said before) but it is looking increasingly like this series has been set-up for Susanna Reid to win. Something is influencing her popularity in some way to induce the betting public (who are presumably also the voting public) to support her cause. She is a long way from being the best dancer, she spent both her dances (including a very sickly sweet Foxtrot) on Saturday night with her mouth hanging slackly open catch flies by the dozen, and yet there she is at even money to win.
Natalie Gumede with her flawless Salsa and smouldering Argentine Tango slipped into the dance off in spite of joint top scoring
with the judges.
The betting on her varied dramatically over the weekend. At one point she was out in the rags at 7/1, then suddenly she regained 2nd fav at about 3/1 and then was cut again to the 9/1 which is the best price currently available. If this kind of wildly fluctuating market pertained to a horse race, the bookies would have suspended betting by now.
Despite my suspicions, I nipped in and had a bit more on Natalie at the 7/1 as I just could not resist the price on such a brilliant dancer. I may even have a bit more as the 9/1 is even more tempting.
I really suspect that the price on Susanna is so short due to knowledgeable BBC employees and their friends and families trying for a Christmas present from the bookies to subsidise their low wages and shockingly poor bonuses and pensions (hem hem!). There is no other reasonable explanation. The comments section in the Mail Online is full of people saying that they have no particular liking for her dancing ability. So who exactly is voting for her? And who does the BBC think it is kidding?
And why are the judges going to be irrelevant at in next week's final?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be moderated