Whereas Vorderman pictured on the left in 2011 when she won the award for the first time may well have deserved the title. As she looks now (right), her bottom seems to owe more to artifice than her natural flesh. In fact that picture makes it look as if she may well have had work done in that area. Certainly super-strength Spanx must be present. Let's face it Vorderman is at least 53 now - of course there's nothing wrong with trying to look good at that age, if you feel you must - but it is suspiciously wrong if the voting overlooks a genuine .contender like Rachel Riley (below)
It's not even as if the idiot voters could plead ignorance of the lovely Rachel because she is, of course, Vorderman's replacement on Countdown. In fact the sheer stupidity of this vote makes me think that it may not be a public vote at all and that there may well be some kind of commercial interest at work. Vorderman is of course an inveterate advertiser and social media whore so a sponsorship deal is not beyond the realms of possibility.
My final comment is that when Vorderman's tight jeans, corset and Spanx are removed, it would be not unexpected if all that flesh sagged to floor level.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be moderated